Thread:191.188.168.80/@comment-6489422-20170113165611

You're the same person on yet another account - abusing multiple accounts in a sad effort to make everything go exactly the way you want them to go. How you've not been perma-banned yet, I have no idea.

And FYI, Royce King II was not only shot down as an example on TV Tropes, but would be rejected as one on just about ANY Wiki that has the trope as a category for antagonists. Why you label him a CM is pathetically clear: he led a gang rape. I don't know what role rape played in your life, nor do I wish to imagine, but when it comes to fictional villains, people have tried to repeatedly drill this into your thick skull -  SINGLE INSTANCES OF RAPE OR MISOGYNISTIC SEXUAL PREDATORY BEHAVIOR ARE NOT AUTOMATIC QUALIFIERS FOR THE CM TROPE. The heinous standards of the works these antagonists feature in and the lineup of criteria for qualyfing as a valid example of a CM has to be considered. Always.

Royce fails to stand out as exceptionally horrible even with his lack of resources and is eclipsed in heinousness by the various evil vampires in the series, therefore he's not a CM. Einshin does nothing particularly awful on his own to stand out, therefore he's not a CM. And yes, Finn's single on-screen crime (which isn't even a rape, BTW) is eclipsed by Ravenna in heinousness, his creeper behavior and boasts of off-screen rape and murder of women are not sufficiently heinous enough by the film's standards (as was pointed out, the film does not really care about Finn's past crimes beyond a convenient plot device and motivator for the Huntsman to kill him), and he has the mitigating quality of being loving and loyal to his sister despite how she treats him, therefore he's not a CM. These villains do not get free passes into the category simply because "I hate them and feel triggered by them, so I want them to be called Complete Monsters, therefore they must be Complete Monsters!" That is not how this ought to work, and to keep pushing for people to see it your way even though that breaks all the rules for qualifying and keeps up examples that most people would disagree qualifies at all, is dictator behavior, plain and simple. 