Thread:Lizardnut101/@comment-961279-20191125142530

When I was talking about antagonist fussing last week, it seemed like you didn't think it was that big of a deal. Here's an example that happened recently:


 * November 18th: character is changed to the "secondary antagonist" when he had been "one of the two main antagonists".
 * Five hours later, a different person changes it back.
 * Fourteen hours later, the first person puts it back to what they had.
 * Five hours after that, a third person changes it to being just the "main antagonist".
 * Only five minutes later, the first person changes it back to "secondary antagonist".
 * A day later, the third person puts it back to what they had (main antagonist) and adds an explanation in the trivia section as to why they're right.
 * Just over two hours later, the first person changes it to "one of the two main antagonists", the way it was before they they changed it the first time on November 18th, and then removed the "this is why I'm right" reason from the trivia section.
 * Four hours later, the first person changed their mind and said the character is the "main antagonist".

In just one week, the first person changed their mind three times about how much of an antagonist the character is. They started with secondary antagonist, then changed it to one of the two main antagonists, and then it became main antagonist. No one else edited the page in between the time the character was called "one of the two main antagonists" and when it became "main antagonist", so this person contradicted themselves.

Does the first person actually know what kind of antagonist the character is? Or, are they changing it just to change it?

That's the sort of thing that's been going on for years and why it's been necessary to get people to stop antagonist fussing. 