Thread:RRabbit42/@comment-27108393-20190912184012/@comment-961279-20190913051047

This is one of the reasons why I don't particularly like the TV Tropes categories, which are kind of grandiose to begin with. Despite how many times criteria is laid out for who would qualify, they start becoming subjective and then people start getting into arguments about it. I'd rather go for simpler and more general categories.

The Villains Wiki is a pretty good guide, but we are not required to follow them. Usually we do, but it's not required.

It's been over a year since I watched Wonder Woman and Justice League and I don't remember exactly what happened in both between Ares and Steppenwolf. Because of that, what I read on the Villains Wiki about them makes me think Ares only fought Steppenwolf because Steppenwolf was intruding on Zeus' and Ares' turf. From the standpoint of the humans Ares didn't like, he is an "On and Off Again Villain/Antagonist" simply because he was busy fighting Steppenwolf. It wasn't, "Hey, guys. I don't like you, but temporarily I do because I've got to go deal with this jerk." and then followed by, "Okay, he's gone. I don't like you again."

I'm going to wrap this up with one more point. There's 115 categories on the DCEU Ares page. That's about a hundred too many for a guy that's only been in two films and one of them was as a cameo. That's accompanied by 34 adjectives for his personality in the Infobox. Do we have 115-149 sentences on the page that provide proof that each category and adjective is true? We don't. We've got 38, not counting what's in the Infobox.

To me, this is another example of how people use categories and the Infobox as a dumping ground for their opinions and they don't bother putting in the effort to put sentences in the main part of the page that would support those opinions.